Think Outside The Box: Would You Press The Button? [SPOILERS]
Tuesday, November 10th, 2009WARNING: The following post contains SPOILERS about the new film The Box. If you do not wish to read SPOILERS, do not read this post. For it does indeed contain SPOILERS. SPOILERS.
Everyone knows the scenario: a well-dressed stranger arrives at your door and presents you with a wood-paneled box, atop which is a glass dome containing a shiny, red button. He says something to the effect of, “if you press the button, someone that you don’t know will totally die and you’ll receive x amount of cash money. Aw yeahz.” What do you do?
This past weekend, Richard Kelly’s adaptation of the classic Richard Matheson story “Button, Button” arrived in theaters and answered the question in true Darko style, with a resounding “I’d… um… well… deformed mind control guy and water teleportation and some NSA experiments funded by lightning aliens and… what was the question?” More than anything, though, Kelly’s film turns the mind back to Matheson’s original philosophical conundrum and the true issues at hand.
What Does it Mean to “Know” Someone?
Matheson’s ending, which is wholly disregarded in the Twilight Zone’s adaptation, and only summarily addressed in Kelly’s film, turns the wording of the enigmatic button contract into its own philosophical dilemma – after the button is activated, the presser’s husband dies and the confused, despondent presser is told, in smirking, ironic-twist fashion, that she never really knew him. Yeah, it’s sort of annoying in that Philosophy 101 “do I really even know myself?!” BUH BUH BUM! kinda way, but it does add a new dimension to the initial problem. You know who I don’t know? RICHARD MATHESON! OHHHH! INSANITY! Statistically speaking, though, it would most likely kill a random Asian person.
What’s a Human Life Worth?
Obviously, the woman in Matheson’s story, who presses the button for a payout of $50,000, values a single human life to be worth, at most, $50,000. The question becomes, of the theoretical individuals who don’t press the button, how many are actually morally incorruptible and how many are merely waiting for a better offer. The button test, as designed, doesn’t assess whether people will compromise their morals and indirectly kill a stranger for money; it tests whether certain individuals will compromise their morals for a specific sum. On one hand, this reveals a major flaw in the well-dressed stranger’s test. On the other hand, it does make you pause to think how much money you’d have to receive to press the button. On a third hand, it makes you think that you’d probably be willing to go as low as $10,000.
Pressing a Button is Fun
Think about how much more money you’d want if you only got to flip a switch or pull on a rope.

Aboriginal mythology tells of an aquatic demon called a “bunyip” that haunts Australia’s riverbeds and marshes, lurking silently beneath the water’s shimmering surface, waiting to devour or drown any careless passersby. At night, the bunyip’s fierce roaring call sounds out across the black, hollow veil of darkness, rousing children from slumber and echoing through the dreams of adults. 

seems unlikely. But a microcosmic case of teenage mass hysteria built around a confused infant moose and a pop cultural zeitgeist that piled a brand-new sensationalist Leonard Nimoy television program onto known UFO tracking at a local airforce base, a rampaging serial killer and an imminent star war?




